The World Bank. World development report 2016. Digital dividends. (The World Bank, 2016).
Marwaha, J. S., Landman, A. B., Brat, G. A., Dunn, T. & Gordon, W. J. Deploying digital health tools within large, complex health systems: key considerations for adoption and implementation. npj Digit. Med. 5, 13 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ricciardi, W. et al. How to govern the digital transformation of health services. Eur. J. Public Health 29, 7–12 (2019).
Google Scholar
Marques, I. C. P. & Ferreira, J. J. M. Digital transformation in the area of health: systematic review of 45 years of evolution. Health Technol. 10, 575–586 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gavrilov, G., Simov, O. & Trajkovik, V. Analysis of Digitalization in Healthcare: Case Study. In ICT Innovations 2020. Machine Learning and Applications (eds Dimitrova, V., Dimitrovski, I.). Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 1316 (Springer, Cham, 2020).
Colldén, C. & Hellström, A. From “Invented here” to “Use it everywhere!”: a Learning health system from bottom and/or top? Learn Health Syst. 6, e10307 (2022).
Google Scholar
Solimini, R., Busardò, F. P., Gibelli, F., Sirignano, A. & Ricci, G. Ethical and legal challenges of telemedicine in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Medicina 57, 1314 (2021).
Google Scholar
Azzopardi-Muscat, N. & Sørensen, K. Towards an equitable digital public health era: promoting equity through a health literacy perspective. Eur. J. Public Health 29, 13–17 (2019).
Google Scholar
Scott Kruse, C. et al. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: a systematic review. J. Telemed. Telecare 24, 4–12 (2018).
Google Scholar
European Union. Assessing the impact of digital transformation of health services. Report of the Expert Panel on effective ways of investing in Health (EXPH). (Publications Office of the European Union, 2019).
Thiel, R. et al. #SmartHealthSystems. International comparison of digital strategies (Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2019).
World Health Organization (WHO) & International Telecommunication Union (ITU). National eHealth Strategy Toolkit. (WHO, 2012).
Bahia, K. & Agnoletto, F. Mobile Connectivity Index Methodology (GSMA, 2022).
cisco. Cisco Digital Readiness Index, https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/about/csr/research-resources/digital-readiness.html (2023).
Economist Impact, Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) & Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Global Health Security Index. GHS Index Methodology. (NTI, 2021).
European Commission. The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). Key Indicators, https://digital-agenda-data.eu/datasets/digital_agenda_scoreboard_key_indicators/indicators (2023).
Global Development Incubator. Global Digital Health Index. Indicators, http://index.digitalhealthindex.org/indicators_info (2023).
International Telecommunication Union (ITU). The ICT Development Index (IDI): conceptual framework and methodology, https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/mis2017/methodology.aspx (2017).
International Telecommunication Union (ITU). ITU-D Cybersecurity Program Global Cybersecurity Index – GCIv5 Reference Model (Methodology), 2023).
Legatum Institute. The 2023 Legatum Prosperity Index. A tool for transformation. Vol. 16th edition (Legatum Institute Foundation, 2023).
Partnership on Measuring ICT for Development. Core List of ICT Indicators (ITU, 2022).
Portulans Institute. The Network Readiness Index 2022. Stepping into the new digital era. How and why digital natives will change the world (Portulans Institute, 2022).
United Nations (UN). E-Government Survey 2022. The Future of Digital Government. (UN, 2022).
World Bank. Digital Dividends. (World Bank, 2016).
World Bank. World Development Indicators, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator?tab=all (2023).
European Commission. DESI composite index, https://digital-decade-desi.digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/datasets/key-indicators/indicators (2024).
Mechael, P. & Edelman, J. K. The State of Digital Health 2019. Global Digital Health Index (Global Development Incubator, 2019).
Hecht, V. J. & Hribernik, N. in Praxis der Sinus-Milieus. Gegenwart und Zukunft eines modernen Gesellschafts- und Zielgruppenmodells (eds Barth, B., Flaig, B. B., Schäuble, N., Tautscher, M.) 103–112 (Springer VS, 2018).
Great Britain Committee of Inquiry into the Future Development of the Public Health Function. Public health in England: The report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Future Development of the Public Health Function. (H.M.S.O., 1988).
Eysenbach, G. What is e-health? J. Med Internet Res. 3, E20 (2001).
Google Scholar
Maass, L., Pan, C. C. & Freye, M. Mapping digital public health interventions among existing digital technologies and internet-based interventions to maintain and improve population health in practice: protocol for a scoping review. JMIR Res. Protoc. 11, e33404 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hasson, F., Keeney, S. & McKenna, H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J. Adv. Nurs. 32, 1008–1015 (2000).
Google Scholar
Dalkey, N. & Helmer, O. An experimental application of the DELPHI method to the use of experts. Manag. Sci. 9, 458–467 (1963).
Google Scholar
Hsu, C.-C. & Sandford, B. A. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 12, 1–9 (2007).
Fusfeld, A. R. Research Program on the Management of Science and Technology: The Delphi Technique, Survey and Comment (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1971).
Landeta, J. Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 73, 467–482 (2006).
Google Scholar
McKenna, H. P. The Delphi technique: a worthwhile research approach for nursing? J. Adv. Nurs. 19, 1221–1225 (1994).
Google Scholar
Cresswell, K. M. et al. Global research priorities to better understand the burden of iatrogenic harm in primary care: an international Delphi exercise. PLOS Med. 10, e1001554 (2013).
Google Scholar
Boulkedid, R., Abdoul, H., Loustau, M., Sibony, O. & Alberti, C. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PLoS One 6, e20476 (2011).
Google Scholar
Lam, K., Iqbal, F. M., Purkayastha, S. & Kinross, J. M. Investigating the ethical and data governance issues of artificial intelligence in surgery: protocol for a Delphi study. JMIR Res. Protoc. 10, e26552 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sinha, I. P., Smyth, R. L. & Williamson, P. R. Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies. PLOS Med. 8, e1000393 (2011).
Google Scholar
Price-Haywood, E. G., Arnold, C., Harden-Barrios, J. & Davis, T. Stop the divide: facilitators and barriers to uptake of digital health interventions among socially disadvantaged populations. Ochsner J. 23, 34–42 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ronquillo, C. & Currie, L. The digital divide: Trends in global mobile and broadband Internet access from 2000-2010. Ni 2012 (2012) 2012, 346 (2012).
Google Scholar
Wienert, J., Jahnel, T. & Maaß, L. What are Digital public health interventions? First steps toward a definition and an intervention classification framework. J. Med. Internet Res. 24, e31921 (2022).
Google Scholar
Tiffin, N., George, A. & LeFevre, A. E. How to use relevant data for maximal benefit with minimal risk: digital health data governance to protect vulnerable populations in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob. Health 4, e001395 (2019).
Google Scholar
Public Health England. Digital-first public health: Public Health England’s digital strategy, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/digital-first-public-health/digital-first-public-health-public-health-englands-digital-strategy (2017).
Wong, B. L. H. et al. The dawn of digital public health in Europe: implications for public health policy and practice. Lancet Reg. Health—Eur. 14, 100316 (2022).
Google Scholar
U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). What is Digital Health?, https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health-center-excellence/what-digital-health (2020).
Winslow, C. E. A. The untilled fields of public health. Science 51, 23–33 (1920).
Google Scholar
Zeeb, H., Pigeot, I. & Schuz, B., Leibniz-WissenschaftsCampus Digital Public Health, B. Digital public health-an overview. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 63, 137–144 (2020).
Google Scholar
Anomaly, J. What is public health? public goods, publicized goods, and the conversion problem. Public Choice 195, 43–53 (2023).
Google Scholar
Abdalla, S. M., Maani, N., Ettman, C. K. & Galea, S. Claiming health as a public good in the post-COVID-19 era. Development (Rome) 63, 200–204 (2020).
Google Scholar
Diamond, I. R. et al. Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 67, 401–409 (2014).
Google Scholar
Jünger, S., Payne, S. A., Brine, J., Radbruch, L. & Brearley, S. G. Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat. Med. 31, 684–706 (2017).
Google Scholar
Dreesen, M. et al. Quality of care for cancer patients on home parenteral nutrition: development of key interventions and outcome indicators using a two-round Delphi approach. Support. Care Cancer 21, 1373–1381 (2013).
Google Scholar
Douillet, D. et al. Outpatient management or hospitalization of patients with proven or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection: the HOME-CoV rule. Intern. Emerg. Med. 15, 1525–1531 (2020).
Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, T. et al. What items should be included in an early warning score for remote assessment of suspected COVID-19? qualitative and Delphi study. BMJ Open 10, e042626 (2020).
Google Scholar
Guckenberger, M. et al. Practice recommendations for lung cancer radiotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: An ESTRO-ASTRO consensus statement. Radiother. Oncol. 146, 223–229 (2020).
Google Scholar
Den Broeder, L., Devilee, J., Van Oers, H., Schuit, A. J. & Wagemakers, A. Citizen Science for public health. Health Promot. Int. 33, 505–514 (2018).
Donohoe, H. M. & Needham, R. D. Moving best practice forward: Delphi characteristics, advantages, potential problems, and solutions. Int. J. Tour. Res. 11, 415–437 (2009).
Google Scholar
Erffmeyer, R. C., Erffmeyer, E. S. & Lane, I. M. The Delphi technique: an empirical evaluation of the optimal number of rounds. Group Organ. Stud. 11, 120–128 (1986).
Google Scholar
Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Transaction Publishers, 1999).
Ming, X., MacLeod, M. & van der Veen, J. Construction and enactment of interdisciplinarity: a grounded theory case study in Liberal Arts and Sciences education. Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact. 40, 100716 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sbaraini, A., Carter, S. M., Evans, R. W. & Blinkhorn, A. How to do a grounded theory study: a worked example of a study of dental practices. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 11, 128 (2011).
Google Scholar
Vinten, G. Open versus closed questions—an open issue. Manag. Decis. 33, 27–31 (1995).
Google Scholar
Fitch, K. et al. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User’s Manual (RAND Corporation, 2001).
Lam, K. et al. A Delphi consensus statement for digital surgery. NPJ Digit. Med. 5, 100 (2022).
Google Scholar
Krasuska, M. et al. Technological capabilities to assess digital excellence in hospitals in high performing health care systems: International eDelphi exercise. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, e17022 (2020).
Google Scholar
Regan, M. et al. Policies and interventions to reduce harmful gambling: an international Delphi consensus and implementation rating study. Lancet Public Health 7, e705–e717 (2022).
Google Scholar
Fink, A., Kosecoff, J., Chassin, M. & Brook, R. H. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am. J. Public Health 74, 979–983 (1984).
Google Scholar
Goluchowicz, K. & Blind, K. Identification of future fields of standardisation: an explorative application of the Delphi methodology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 78, 1526–1541 (2011).
Google Scholar
Nasa, P., Jain, R. & Juneja, D. Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness. World J. Methodol. 11, 116–129 (2021).
Google Scholar
Penna, A. et al. Do different physicians’ panels reach similar conclusions? A case study on practice guidelines for limited surgery in breast cancer. Eur. J. Public Health 7, 436–440 (1997).
Google Scholar
Keeney, S., Hasson, F. & McKenna, H. P. A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 38, 195–200 (2001).
Google Scholar
Glöggler, M. & Ammenwerth, E. Improvement and evaluation of the TOPCOP taxonomy of patient portals: Taxonomy-Evaluation-Delphi (TED) approach. J. Med. Internet Res. 23, e30701 (2021).
Google Scholar
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualit. Psychol. 9, 3–26 (2022).
Google Scholar
Odone, A., Buttigieg, S., Ricciardi, W., Azzopardi-Muscat, N. & Staines, A. Public health digitalization in Europe: EUPHA vision, action and role in digital public health. Eur. J. Public Health 29, 28–35 (2019).
Google Scholar
