Apple could face unexpected fines in new US government lawsuit, CIO study complains about application sprawl, but suggests the way out is 'more apps' 1% of employees are responsible for 89% of data loss events and information surfaces, with potentially huge AI developments occurring in the coming months.
These articles and more are featured in the “Sum of All Fears” edition of Hashtag Trends. I'm your host, Jim Love. So let's get down to business:
Even if Apple manages to win the lawsuit filed last week by the US Department of Justice, it could face disclosure penalties, which it fears more than fines.
The legal battle could force disclosure of Apple's most closely guarded secrets, with discovery revealing detailed insights into the company's operations, strategy and unannounced projects. .
Apple's obsession with managing both secrecy and public image could be badly hurt, as the courtroom becomes an arena in which aspects of the company's business that are usually shrouded in secrecy may be exposed. There is sex.
This has happened in past legal battles. When Apple sued Samsung a decade ago, the company was forced to share details of unreleased prototypes, market research, and a top-secret design process. The case reveals details that other tech companies prefer to keep secret, with Intel, Qualcomm and others filing motions to keep their deals from becoming public record.
Then in 2005, ironically, Apple went to court to punish those who leaked product information, forcing it to once again confirm unreleased products.
Perhaps this experience has made Apple better at protecting its information in lawsuits, or perhaps it's just PR bravado, but an Apple spokesperson told Axios, “Over the past 15 years, we have “We have filed ten high-profile lawsuits.” . “The Justice Department has already accessed millions of documents during the course of their investigation. But they just used the same well-worn documents that are part of the public record.”
Let's take a look.
Source: Axios
According to the Harris Poll, 84% of CIOs surveyed are concerned about “application sprawl.” Again according to the report, the number of new applications is increasing at an alarming rate. In 2022, the number of new applications was between 20 and 40 per year. By 2024, that volume has increased to 30 to 60 new applications per year.
Not surprisingly, half of those surveyed were planning to integrate various applications.
Where are these applications coming from? Many of these appear to be new AI applications, although the report doesn't explicitly say this.
90% of CIOs sampled agreed that AI tools have the potential to dramatically improve not only the performance of their employees, but also their own performance.
When asked about the benefits of AI applications, half, or 52%, said AI saves them time on creative tasks. 50% feel that AI has helped them gain data-driven insights. And in an answer that I didn't fully understand, half of them felt that AI would help integrate applications. My question was: Will AI consolidate applications faster than the growth that is driving the number of applications? Our research on “Application Sprawl” shows that 94% plan to invest in these new AI-powered tools.
Do you have any other observations? 70% claim they have established some kind of “guardrails” to safely use AI in the workplace.
The survey surveyed 1,369 CIOs in the United States and approximately 150 in the United States, Spain, Germany, France, Brazil, Mexico, India, and Australia.
And once again – look how many times this happens – there is no mention of Canada. Therefore, I will not say who organized this poll. Sounds fair to me.
Source: Harris Poll
According to a report from security firm Proofpoint, the average organization has dealt with approximately 15 data loss incidents in the past year alone, which equates to more than once a month. A whopping 71% of respondents identified careless users as the culprit behind these breaches.
This can range from misdirecting emails to visiting phishing sites, installing unauthorized software, and emailing sensitive data to personal accounts. Although these actions are preventable, they suggest a significant lack of organizational vigilance.
One of the most common but easily avoidable causes of data loss is misdirected email. According to the report, one-third of employees are sending emails to the wrong recipient, posing a serious risk to the security of their data.
A company with 5,000 employees would experience 3,400 misdirected emails per year. These errors are not just simple mistakes; they can also expose you to sensitive information, which can result in hefty fines under GDPR or other privacy laws.
The rise of generative AI technologies such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, Bing Chat, and Google Gemini is the fastest growing area of concern. As these tools become more popular, these models are increasingly being used for sensitive information.
Not all data loss incidents are accidental or careless. Approximately 20% of respondents identified malicious insiders, such as employees or contractors, who could intentionally cause a breach. They may also be presumed to have more serious consequences due to this deliberate intent.
The study identifies employee turnover as a significant risk factor. It is not because the individual perceives his or her actions to be malicious. Rather, they feel entitled to carry certain information with them. Proofpoint's data shows an alarming trend: 87% of the unusual file leaks that occurred between cloud tenants over a nine-month period were due to departed employees.
However, privileged users such as human resources and finance with access to sensitive data are considered the highest risk, accounting for just 1% of 88% of data loss events. This finding highlights the importance of proactively managing and monitoring privileged access, which many organizations do not do effectively.
On a positive note, this study shows that organizations' approaches to data loss prevention are maturing, moving from compliance-driven measures to a more holistic approach to data security, particularly in areas that have shown significant vulnerabilities, such as healthcare and government. It became clear that there was a shift towards a more
Source: Proofpoint
And finally, there are reports that Open AI will release a new model, which some are calling GPT5, in the middle of this year. Whatever the name, Sam Altman himself said in a recent speech that this will be a significant upgrade.
YouTube commentator Wes Ross, who follows OpenAI closely, reports that several CEOs have had early access to the new model, with one saying it's “much better.”
So, what will this new development look like? Comments from people who have seen the model have once again fueled speculation that it could become an autonomous agent. These intelligent agents can learn, plan, and take action in the real world and represent the next stage in AI development.
These autonomous agents already exist. We covered them a while back when RabbitR1 was released for use.
But last week we had another example of just how powerful these agents are. DevinAI is an autonomous AI agent built by Cognition Labs for software developers. Devin is an agent who learns from his work and mistakes, which turns out to be a very powerful and sophisticated development tool.
Wharton professor Ethan Myrick asked Devin to join Reddit to promote his services for web development. In a since-deleted thread, Devin said he joined Reddit so he could understand and follow the rules about how developers can seek assignments.
I also understood that I should try to charge a fee for my work.
Devin went to Reddit and posted on the thread to monitor the responses.
Devin's post had 366 views and several comments, and Devin responded by asking Reddit for an API key. At that point, Morik stopped the experiment and removed the post.
The goal was not to scam anyone or make money, but to demonstrate that it is possible to build autonomous agents that can successfully navigate even the nuances of social media, even at the level of GPT4.
That is where we are today. What will the next level of autonomous agents be able to do? This will be a major development. AI will no longer be a passive agent answering questions, but will be able to take action in the real world.
Combine this with what's happening in robotics, and buckle up, this is going to be an interesting year.
That's today's show.
Remind your friends that they can reach us anywhere they get audio podcasts, including Google, Apple, Spotify, and even on their smart speakers. Also, if you like the podcast, please give us a good review. That's important. As you may know, we have a copy of the show notes at itworldcanada.com/podcasts.
I'm your host, Jim Love. Have a wonderful Monday!
